Theropod Classification
Order Theropoda
Traditional classification
The current page is the first (in order of writing it, 20 Feb 2012, not in topic sequence) of a new page type for Palaeos, the taxonomic classification page. These pages have been written to fill the need for a traditional rank-based (rather than phylogeny based) taxonomic list of various organisms and groups covered in each unit. The following therefore is not a cladistic or phylogenetic classification of the sort pioneered by Gauthier (1986) or Holtz (2000), but , which was purely Linnaean, a la Carroll 1988). As we have often stated, the Linnaean and Cladistic methodologies of organising the natural world are only contradictory when it is assumed that there can only be one. Since we believe that these (and any number of other possible) methodologies are non-exclusive, there is no reason why both cannot equally be used in their respective contexts.
We have not attempted to equate Linnaean ranks with clades, because the result would be the need for a near-infinite series of ranks, and a confusing of similarity-based categories with phylogenetic branching points. As we have often stated, the Linnaean and Cladistic methodologies of organising the natural world are only contradictory when it is assumed that there can only be one. Since we believe that these (and any number of other possible) methodologies are non-exclusive, there is no reason why both cannot equally be used in their respective contexts.
The following taxonomy is based mainly on Carroll (1988), as the most recent comprehensive linnaean classification of the Vertebrates, and an update of Romer 1966 Vertebrate Paleontology. This has in turn been updated in a few places, but we have tried to limit the number of new taxa, as it is so easy to go overboard with this sort of thing. Newly coined taxa are indicated by inverted commas. Each taxon is listed by rank, name, and original author, and followed by a short description. For the phylogenetic arrangement see the dendrogram page. For a rather unweildly attempt at a linnaean-cladistic synthesis, see below. The remainder of the theropoda can be found listed in the Coelurosauria classification page MAK120220 120312 120506
Infraclass
Archosauromorpha Huene, 1946 (
cont.)
Order
Theropoda Marsh, 1881
bipedal, mostly carnivorous, dinosaurs.
Suborder
Herrerasauria Galton 1985
small to medium-sized ancestral theropods, limited to the late Trias.
Family Staurikosauridae Colbert, 1970
Typal family for Staurikosaurus pricei, a primitive herrerasaur
Family Herrerasauridae Reig, 1963
Typical herrerasaurs, medium-sized very primitive theropods
Suborder unspecified
Eodromaeus,
Eoraptor,
Daemonosaurus, and
Tawa small, primitive/ancestral late Trias types
Suborder
Ceratosauria Marsh, 1884
diverse group of small to very large, primitive theropods with three-toed feet, four-fingered hands, and a tendency to deveop crests and horns for intraspecific display.
Family
Podokesauridae Huene, 1914
small to large, lightly built, ancestral theropods, frequently with paired head crests. The head is long, the front of the snout with a distinctive kink. Late Trias to early Jur, cosmopolitan
Subfamily
Podokesaurinae small ancestral types, LTr to EJu, previously included under "Coelurosauria".
Subfamily
Dilophosaurinae Charig & Milner, 1990
large ancestral types, essentially overgrown podokesaurs with a few more advanced features, EJu, Cosmopolitan, intermediate between Podokesaurinae and both Carnosauria and higher Ceratosaurs.
Family
Ceratosauridae Marsh, 1884
large, persistantly primitive, late Jur theropods, mostly in the shadow of their more successful and advanced Allosaurid contemporaries, monotypal (Ceratosaurus)
Family
"Limusauridae" Nov.
medium-sized, lightly built, highy specialised late Jur theropods, include toothless ostrich mimics
Family
Bahariasauridae Huene, 1948
huge, lightly built, long-legged, ceratosaurs; so far known only from the MidCret of north-central Gondw (nth Afr)
Family
Noasauridae Bonaparte & Powell, 1980
small, lightly built ceratosaurs, intermediate between more primitive types and abelisaurids, and closely related to the latter. Mid to Late Cret of Gondw
Family
Abelisauridae Bonaparte & Novas, 1985
large to very large, advanced and highly specialised ceratosaurs, frequently with horns or crests. Forearms extremely diminutive. Advanced forms were the fastest large theropods. Mid to Late Cret of Gondw & Eur
Suborder Carnosauria Huene, 1920
originally the term for all large to huge theropods. Here used to refer to the evolutionary range of large types intermediate between ceratosaurs and coelurians
Superfamily
Megalosauroidea Huxley, 1889
ancestral and persistantly primitive Carnosaurs
Family Megalosauridae Huxley, 1889
unspecialised Jurassic forms
Subfamily Megalosaurinae Huxley, 1889
the most common primitive carnosaurs, flourished during the mid and late Jur
Subfamily: Eustreptospondylinae Paul, 1988
similar to and contemporary with the Megalosaurinae, ancedtral to the spinosaurids
Family Spinosauridae Stromer, 1915
large to gigantic fish-eating megalosaurs with elongated vertebral spines and crocodile-like jaws with specialized teeth, have a long kinked snout reminscient of podokesaurs Early to Mid Cret of Eur & Gondw
Subfamily Baryonychinae Charig & Milner, 1986
large to very large, little or no sail on back
Subfamily Spinosaurinae
medium-sized to gigantic spinosaurs
Tribe Spinosaurini
gigantic fin-backed theropods, Mid Cret of North Africa, monotypal (Spinosaurus)
Tribe Irritatorini Martill, Cruickshank, Frey, Small & Clarke, 1996
smallish west Gondwanan spinosaurines, monotypal (originally family Irritatoridae)
Superfamily
Allosauroidea Marsh, 1878
advanced Carnosaurs
Family "
Monolophosauridae" Bakker, 1997
ancestral crested forms, perhaps intermediate between megalosaurs and allosaurs, known so far only from a single species from the Mid Jur of China
Family
Sinraptoridae Currie & Zhao, 1994
large to gigantic Mid to Late Jur allosaurs known from Asia & Europe, intermediate between megalosaurs and higher allosaurs. Alternatively, could be a subfamily of the Allosauridae
Family Allosauridae Marsh, 1878
large to gigantic, advanced carnosaurs, late Jur to Late Cret
Subfamily
Allosaurinae the classic large Late Jur theropod, strong three-fingered forearm, monotypal (Allosaurus), usually ranked as a family
Subfamily
Carcharodontosaurinae Stromer, 1931
gigantic early to Mid Cret allosaurs, including the largest terrestrial predators. Usually given family ranking
Subfamily Neovenatorinae Benson, Carrano & Brusatte, 2010
here used as a monotypic taxon for the large but slender Neovenator saleri Hutt, Martill & Barker, 1996, Neoventoridae is a monophyletic taxon that includes Neovenator and the megaraptors
Family
Megaraptoridae Benson, Carrano & Brusatte, 2010
medium-sized lightly built allosaurs, same as Clade Megaraptora, convergent with coelurosaurs, Mid to Late Cret of Gondwanan, We believe this group is distinct enough to deserve family ranking
Suborder Coeluria Marsh, 1881 (= Coelurosauria Huene, 1914) (
see next unit)
Theropoda is conventially paced as a suborder of Order Saurischia Seeley, 1887. But since the three dinosaurian groups (Theropoda, Sauropodomorpha, and Ornithischia) all diverged at the same time and remained consistently distinct and diverse lineages, we felt that Theropoda should be promoted to Ordinal status, and Saurischia become an unranked taxon. Similarily, although Superorder Dinosauria Owen, 1842 is a totally valid taxon, this has not been listed because it would require creating artificial monotypic superorders for other archosauromorph orders (e.g. Thecodonts, Pterosauria, Crocodylia). In keeping with our classification system, Theropoda is here ranked as a paraphyletic order, because under the gradist evolutionary paradigm theropods evolve into birds, but are not themselves birds. In a cladistic classification system that uses Linnaean ranks, Birds would be a suborder of Theropoda. In these classification pages however we follow Carroll 1988 and traditional linnaeanism in giving birds their own class rank. Transitional forms such as Archaeopteryx could equally correctly be clasisfied under birds or dinosaurs.
With Theropoda becoming an order, previous infraorders (such as Herrerasauria) now become suborders.
The changing cladistic definition of the Ceratosauria is discussed here. At one time considered a monophyletic clade, this latter usage has now been redefined for more advanced forms only. To avoid excessive multiplication of suborders (such as a new suborder Ceolophysoidea or similar), Ceratosauria is here used in the context of Suborder Ceratosauria sensu Paul (1988) (but with abelisaurs added), or Parasuborder Ceratosauria sensu Olshevsky 1991 (but minus Megalosaurids); i.e. as a paraphyletic group including both ancestral (podokesaurid) and specialised (= monophyletic Ceratosauria) forms.
Metriacanthosauridae Paul, 1988 was coined earlier but was not associated with a formal description, and so cannot be used as an official name.
Hybrid classification
While for the most part we have following a conventional linnaean approach in these taxonomic pages, we have also been inspired by Olshevsky 1991. In his important amateur (non-peer reviewed) paper, Olshevsky distinguished between paraphyletic and monophyletic taxa (grades and clades). But whereas he only used one prefix, para- in front of the rank of paraphyletic taxa (e.g. parafamily, monophyletic taxa being unmodified), by adopting the following key:
When no prefix is used, we haven't gotten around to assessing the taxon (or the current page is still under construction). Cont. for Continued means that the taxon begins in a previous unit.
Linnaean names may not match their cladistic equivalents. For example, that a linnaean and evolutionary/gradist taxon, in excluding certain descendent groups from a taxon, can be a Paraorder or Parainfraclass in this schema. By including those descendents the same taxon would be an unranked monophyletic clade according to a strictly cladistic scheme. Hence Theropoda can be both a para(sub)order of dinosaurs and an unranked clade.
The following hybrid taxonomy It is also so experimental and unweidly that we at first thought of deleting it, but in the end decided to subordinate it to a more conventional page. Other attempts at cladistic/linnaean synthesis include Paul (1988) (the obvious inspiration for Olshevsky (1991)), and Benton (2005). MAK120220 120312 120506
Parainfraclass
Archosauromorpha Huene, 1946 (
cont.)
Paraorder
Theropoda Marsh, 1881
bipedal, mostly carnivorous, dinosaurs.
Parasuborder
Herrerasauria Galton 1985
small to medium-sized ancestral theropods, limited to the late Trias.
Monofamily Staurikosauridae Colbert, 1970
Monotypal family for Staurikosaurus pricei, a primitive herrerasaur
Ambifamily Herrerasauridae Reig, 1963
Typical herrerasaurs, medium-sized very primitive theropods
Parasuborder unspecified
Eodromaeus,
Eoraptor,
Daemonosaurus, and
Tawa small, primitive/ancestral late Trias types
Parasuborder
Ceratosauria Marsh, 1884
diverse group of small to very large, primitive theropods with three-toed feet, four-fingered hands, and a tendency to deveop crests and horns for intraspecific display.
Parafamily
Podokesauridae Huene, 1914
small to large, lightly built, ancestral theropods, frequently with paired head crests. The head is long, the front of the snout with a distinctive kink. Late Trias to early Jur, cosmopolitan
Evosubfamily
Podokesaurinae small ancestral types, LTr to EJu, previously included under "Coelurosauria".
Ambisubfamily
Dilophosaurinae Charig & Milner, 1990
large ancestral types, essentially overgrown podokesaurs with a few more advanced features, EJu, Cosmopolitan, intermediate between Podokesaurinae and both Carnosauria and higher Ceratosaurs.
Monofamily
Ceratosauridae Marsh, 1884
large, persistantly primitive, late Jur theropods, mostly in the shadow of their more successful and advanced Allosaurid contemporaries, monotypal (Ceratosaurus)
Evofamily
"Limusauridae" Nov.
medium-sized, lightly built, highy specialised late Jur theropods, include toothless ostrich mimics
Monofamily
Bahariasauridae Huene, 1948
huge, lightly built, long-legged, ceratosaurs; so far known only from the MidCret of north-central Gondw (nth Afr)
Ambifamily
Noasauridae Bonaparte & Powell, 1980
small, lightly built ceratosaurs, intermediate between more primitive types and abelisaurids, and closely related to the latter. Mid to Late Cret of Gondw
Holofamily
Abelisauridae Bonaparte & Novas, 1985
large to very large, advanced and highly specialised ceratosaurs, frequently with horns or crests. Forearms extremely diminutive. Advanced forms were the fastest large theropods. Mid to Late Cret of Gondw & Eur
Parasuborder Carnosauria Huene, 1920
originally the term for all large to huge theropods. Here used to refer to the evolutionary range of large types intermediate between ceratosaurs and coelurians
Parasuperfamily
Megalosauroidea Huxley, 1889
ancestral and persistantly primitive Carnosaurs
Evofamily Megalosauridae Huxley, 1889
unspecialised Jurassic forms
Evosubfamily Megalosaurinae Huxley, 1889
the most common primitive carnosaurs, flourished during the mid and late Jur
Evosubfamily: Eustreptospondylinae Paul, 1988
similar to and contemporary with the Megalosaurinae, ancedtral to the spinosaurids
Holofamily Spinosauridae Stromer, 1915
large to gigantic fish-eating megalosaurs with elongated vertebral spines and crocodile-like jaws with specialized teeth, have a long kinked snout reminscient of podokesaurs Early to Mid Cret of Eur & Gondw
Holosubfamily Baryonychinae Charig & Milner, 1986
large to very large, little or no sail on back
Holosubfamily Spinosaurinae
medium-sized to gigantic spinosaurs
Monotribe Spinosaurini
gigantic fin-backed theropods, Mid Cret of North Africa, monotypal (Spinosaurus)
Monotribe Irritatorini Martill, Cruickshank, Frey, Small & Clarke, 1996
smallish west Gondwanan spinosaurines, monotypal (originally family Irritatoridae)
Evosuperfamily
Allosauroidea Marsh, 1878
advanced Carnosaurs
Monofamily "
Monolophosauridae" Bakker, 1997
ancestral crested forms, perhaps intermediate between megalosaurs and allosaurs, known so far only from a single species from the Mid Jur of China
Evofamily
Sinraptoridae Currie & Zhao, 1994
large to gigantic Mid to Late Jur allosaurs known from Asia & Europe, intermediate between megalosaurs and higher allosaurs. Alternatively, could be a subfamily of the Allosauridae
Holofamily Allosauridae Marsh, 1878
large to gigantic, advanced carnosaurs, late Jur to Late Cret
Monosubfamily
Allosaurinae the classic large Late Jur theropod, strong three-fingered forearm, monotypal (Allosaurus), usually ranked as a family
Holosubfamily
Carcharodontosaurinae Stromer, 1931
gigantic early to Mid Cret allosaurs, including the largest terrestrial predators. Usually given family ranking
Monosubfamily Neovenatorinae Benson, Carrano & Brusatte, 2010
here used as a monotypic taxon for the large but slender Neovenator saleri Hutt, Martill & Barker, 1996, Neoventoridae is a monophyletic taxon that includes Neovenator and the megaraptors
Holosubfamily Megaraptorinae Benson, Carrano & Brusatte, 2010
medium-sized lightly built allosaurs, same as Clade Megaraptora, convergent with coelurosaurs, Mid to Late Cret of Gondwanan, If ranked as Holofamily Megaraptoridae, then Allosauridae and Carcharodontosaurinae become a Parafamily and Parasubfamily respectively
Parasuborder Coeluria Marsh, 1881 (= Coelurosauria Huene, 1914) (
see next unit)
Links
The major dinosaur families at Enchanted Learning; Taxon tree; Linnean Theropoda, dinosaur mailing list, draws strongly on Greg Paul 1988 but with inflated ranks (subfamilies become families etc)
page MAK120220 last modified 120506