Generic name means "unity, agreement, harmony", refers to the fact that the occurrence of a captorhinid in Upper Pennsylvanian strata confirms the long-held assumption that captorhinids must have existed as early as in Late Carboniferous times. Species named after the after the paleontologist Christopher R. Cunningham.
premaxilla short, not overlapping lower jaw [MR05]; premaxilla without ventral curvature [MR05!]; premaxilla with 2-pronged nasal suture [MR05]; Type B septomaxilla, close to posterior border of naris [MR05]; maxilla slender & elongate [MR05]; maxilla dorsal lamina slight [MR05]; maxilla forming ventral border of naris, not extending to orbit [MR05$]; maxilla with well-developed horizontal lamina, expanded anteromedially [MR05]; nasals long, plate-like, rectangular, with slight expansion posteriorly [MR05]; lacrimal quite large, forming most of anterior & half of ventral orbital margin [MR05]; lacrimal dorsally expanded [MR05$]; dorsal & ventral lacrimal duct foramina on lacrimal in orbital margin [MR05]; lacrimal strongly interdigitating nasal suture [MR05]; lacrimal elongate contact with jugal [MR05]; prefrontal posteriorly elongate, almost reaching postfrontal & forming much of orbit dorsal margin [MR05]; prefrontal wide anterior to orbit, with sharp anterior tip wedged between nasal & lacrimal [MR05]; lacrimal suture with nasal as long as frontal suture [MR05]; prefrontal ventral lamina partially covered by lacrimal [MR05]; frontals rectangular, forming most of skull table above orbits [MR05]; frontals slightly expanded posteriorly, with serrated suture to parietals [MR05]; postfrontal triradiate, with sharp anterior point, and forming posterodorsdal orbit [MR05]; postfrontal with posterior point inserted into parietal [MR05]; parietals short, much broader than frontals, & posteriorly embayed, creating 1 median and 2 lateral posterior processes [MR05!]; posterolateral process of parietal with slot for small, superficial supratemporal [MR05]; anterior of supratemporal on skull table, with ornament, but posterior occipital and unornamented [MR05]; parietal with extended occipital flange underlying paired, adjacent, semilunar postparietals on occiput [MR05]; tabulars absent [MR05]; jugal large, forming most of suborbital skull, with long preorbital process, short dorsal postorbital process, and flat temporal lamina [MR05]; jugal anterior tapers to a point [!] & inserts between maxilla & lacrimal [MR05]; jugal dorsal process supports postorbital [MR05]; jugal temporal lamina extend below squamosal & probably contact quadratojugal [MR05]; jugal medial process absent [MR05]; jugal with distinct anterior and posterior ventral margins [MR05]; squamosal large, covering most of temporal region, bearing distinct occipital flange separated by vertical ridge [MR05]; quadrate broad in lateral view, with tall dorsal process [MR05]; basioccipital longer than broad, with anterolateral basal tubera [MR05]; basioccipital forming part of occipital condyle [MR05]; spraoccipital with well and "almost equally developed dorsolateral and ventrolateral processes surrounded by prominent, dorsally directed flanges. The semicircular canals are situated between the two projections." [MR05: 564]; opisthotic stout and compact, with paroccipital process absent; stapes short, with poorly developed shaft & large stapedial foramen [MR05!]; alar (posterior) basisphenoid projections probably contacted basisphenoid tubera [MR05]; parasphenoid completely fused to basisphenoid [MR05]; basipterygoid processes stout & directed anterolaterally [MR05]; parasphenoid cultriform process denticulate [MR05!]; vomer small [MR05]; pterygoids terminating anteriorly on midline between vomers [MR05]; interpterygoid vacuity present posteriorly [MR05]; pterygoid quadrate ramus with separate dorsal flange extending from basicranial articulation to dorsal process of quadrate, supporting elongate epipterygoid [MR05]; lower jaw largely unornamented [MR05]; lower jaw with long dorsal ridge for external jaw adductor [MR05!]; dentary quite straight, with abrupt curvature to symphysis [MR05]; long splenial present, not contributing to symphysis [MR05]; dentary makes up 75% length of jaw [MR05]; retroarticular process absent [MR05!]; articular small and lens-like [MR05]; teeth generally small, homodont, pointed & recurved distally [MR05]; 5 small, pointed, premaxillary teeth [MR05]; caniniforms absent, but 4 anterior maxillary teeth somewhat elongate, others shortening posteriorly [MR05!]; single maxillary tooth row with 18 teeth [MR05]; probably 17 dentary teeth [MR05]; 2 vomerine tooth rows, with medial row continuing pterygoid denticles [MR05]; vomerine lateral denticles autapomorphic [MR05$].
Concordia cunninghami is the oldest known and most basal captorhinid so far and the only recognized species of the genus. It is known from two almost complete skulls coming from Upper Pennsylvanian rocks of the famous Hamilton Quarry in Greenwood County, Kansas.
C. cunninghami not surprisingly shows many features that are typical for basal eureptiles but are not present in more derived captorhinids. The premaxilla is small and seems not to have formed a down-curved "beak" as it is seen in almost all of the remainder of the captorhinids. The lacrimal is dorsoventrally expanded and forms the main portion of the lateral wall of the snout which is similar to the condition in Rhiodenticulatus. The skull table lacks the tabular bone, a feature considered as synapomorphy among captorhinids. The supratemporal is small as well and points, in dorsal view, anteromedially into the posterolateral corner of the parietal as seen in another basalmost captorhinid, Romeria, or in the "Protorothyridid" Protorothyris. The same applies for the posterior margin of the skull roof which is embayed bilaterally in contrast to the pattern present in more derived captorhinids where this margin posesses a single median embayment. Like in Romeria and Protocaptorhinus the parietal foramen is very large compared to the overall size of the skull.
Maxilla and dentary are lined with a single row of as much as 18 small, pointed teeth. The palatal bones and the basisphenoid (a ventral element of the braincase) are covered with numerous denticles. A unique feature of C. cunninghami is that the vomer not only exhibits medial rows of denticles but, in addition, has also lateral ones. An important captorhinid apomorphy, the reduction of the ectopterygoid and replacement of that bone by the adjacent ones, seems to be present in C. cunninghami where it is obviously replaced by the transverse process of the pterygoid. In Captorhinus, however, it is rather a medial process of the jugal that occupies the position of the ectopterygoid. A remarkable occipital feature is that the opisthotic seems not to have the lateral projection which usually contacts the cheek bones, known as paroccipital process. This process is a characteristic trait in all basal amniotes as well as in more modern reptiles, such as squamates.
The oldest known eureptile and one of the closest relatives of captorhinids is the "Protorothyridid" Hylonomus from the Upper Pennsylvanian of Nova Scotia. Thus, although still geologically younger, the discovery of C. cunninghami considerably shortens the ghost lineage of the captorhinids.
"!" indicates feature unique among captorhinids, but likely plesiomorphic for Eureptilia.
The postfrontal in the referred specimen has a different shape. It is probably simply broken, but the bone labelled "postorbital" in the referred specimen has the correct shape for the postfrontal, and might have been dislodged by a fragment labelled "postfrontal"), which could, in turn, be a piece of the thoroughly splintered epipterygoid. These skulls were both recovered from split shales. The fossil side was then embeded in resin and apparantly prepared from the opposite (rock) side. This, the authors note, created some difficulties in identifying pieces deeply embedded in the resin, such as the circumorbital bones of the referred specimen.
One problem with getting too artistic is that it can obscure details. Our attempts to gussy up the figure from [MR05] obscure this insertion, which is quite clear in the original image.
Note that the semicircular canals, i.e. normally the guts of the otic capsule, are described as lying dorsal to the supraoccipital. Ummm. We have concerns about this reconstruction of the occiput and posterior braincase. After struggling with it for some hours, we've decided that we lack sufficient expertise to make any comments at all, beyond this vaguely dissatisfied grunting noise. We therefore grunt, and readers may make of that what they will.
The paroccipital process is said to be absent. However, observe the opisthotic illustrated on the left side of the holotype (dorsal view) image here. It shows an unprecedented ventromedially directed process. Ummm. See footnote 3 for explanation of grunting noise.
