Insecta | ||
Arthropoda | Insecta (2) |
Insecta | Arthropoda | Hexapoda
└─► |
||
Hexapoda | Pterygota |
Abbreviated Dendrogram
|
Contents
Overview |
In simplified form, the higher level classification of the basal insects looks like this:
There seems to be general agreement about who belongs here, but no consensus on how to sort them into Archaeognatha, Monura, and Thysanura. Many, otherwise sensible, people continue to use the term "Zygentoma" to refer to the paraphyletic group containing all of these taxa except the Pterygota. We will use the following scheme, which probably keeps everyone together with their closest relatives, but may not put things in the proper buckets.
The particular arrangement of thysanuran families adopted here is stitched together from a few comments about the views of Jules Barlet in Bitsch 2003). Since this is hearsay authority, our arrangement should be taken with even less seriousness than is usual.
We will deal with these basal insects in the same three unequal blocks: the Archaeognatha, the Monura, and the Thysanura. The Pterygota, constituting all the other insects, will be discussed elsewhere. The three groups of immediate interest are sometimes collectively called the "Apterygota," the wingless insects. However, that term is more usually used in the older literature to refer to the paraphyletic group containing springtails and other Parainsecta, in addition to Archaeognatha, Monura, and Thysanura.
Archaeognatha = Microcoryphia)
These are all relatively small insects, never longer than 2 cm, most of which is "tail." The head is small, but surrounded by a large notumand appears large. Archaeognaths have rather large, compound eyes, which meet medially and glow if illuminated at night. And wouldn't that be an amusing thing to wake up to? Their name derives from the primitive articulation of the mandibles. The mandibles articulate with the body at only a single condyle joint). All other insects have two condyles. The antennae are long and divided into many short segments. The thorax is stiff and raised at an angle, giving the insect a hump-backed appearance in lateral view. The abdominal body is soft and flexible. It is long, tapers posteriorly, and is covered in tiny scales. Abdominal segments 2-9 bear tiny auxilliary limbs (styles) which are moveable and aid in locomotion. Abdominal segments 1-7 bear eversible vesicles. The body terminates in three long, thin cerci "tails"). The longer middle cercus is actually the 11th abdominal segment. Like all basal insects, Archaeognathae lack wings. |
||
|
CercopodataThis is a Permo-Carboniferous fossil group with abdominal appendages and leg- like, segmented cerci. However, cercopodates may have two mandibular condyles, which would be anomalous for true Archaeognatha. Note that, since the "tail" is derived from the 11th abdominal segment, the implication is that the cerci maybe evolved from the limbs of the 11th segment. |
|
Machiloidea
|
||
|
Triassomachilis (= Mesoneta?)
|
|
Meinertellidae * Yes. Apparently, Machilis is not a member of the Machilidae. Go figure. |
||
Machilidae
|
The Monura are a group of vague and doubtful affinities. There is a sense in some of the literature that Monura was erected because something ought to occupy this phylospace -- not because the fossil evidence actually compelled that conclusion.
Monura
The characters which have been ascribed to the Monura include: supernumary ocelli (unique), segmented jaw parts (hard to accept on Perhaps the truth of the matter is that we simply have too little data to draw a firm conclusion at the moment. |
With the Thysanura, we return to firmer phylogenetic ground. Recently, a few mischievous junior members of the Molecule Mob have suggested that mayflies evolved from within the Thysanura. In other words, they suppose that flight evolved twice in insects. Nardi et al. (2003). This is unlikely. However, flight is a demanding business. Flying animals tend to diverge far and quickly from their non-flying cousins because of the stringent mechanical demands of flight and the selective pressures faced (and avoided) as a result of the ability to fly. For that matter, mayflies are not morphologically so different from thysanurans that we can reject Nardi's suggestion out of hand. Certainly, this hypothesis is infinitely preferable to the semi-molecular work of Giribet et al. (2001), who require three independent origins of flight (its either that, or flying lobsters -- the choice is yours, folks) and place fruit flies as the sister group of diplurans and barnacles! Nevertheless, more senior Moleculons have intervened, bearing reams of Beyesian statistics showing that no definite conclusions can yet be drawn. Delsuc et al. (2003). Thus the public fisc is once again impoverished to support contending, fruitless speculations -- but, undoubtedly, our discourse is much enriched in compensation.
What all these molecular studies do show is that the Pancrustacea hypothesis is correct. Generations of morphologists have been unable to determine the branching order of Chelicerata, Myriapoda, Crustacea and Insecta. By repeatedly and strongly supporting Pancrustacea, the molecular results shift the weight of evidence decisively in favor of an insect-crustacean clade. We reluctantly concede that molecules have helped immensely to resolve this intractable issue. Flight may have developed more than once, but there are theoretical, as well as morphological, reasons to doubt this. Zherikhin (2002).
Thysanura
The body is dorsoventrally flattened. The compound eyes are reduced or absent. If present, the compound eyes are always well-separated. One to three ocelli may be present. Then again, they may not. The mandibles are notable for being covered by a 'beard' of small hairs, as are other parts of the body, including the caudal filament, the tail-like extension at the posterior end. The abdomen has ten segments, and bears two posterior cerci in addition to the aforesaid caudal filament (actually the 11th abdominal segment), just as in the Archaeognathae. However, unlike archaeognaths, the cerci of thysanurans are almost as long as the "tail." This is the source of the taxon name, which combines the Greek word for tasseled (θυσανόεις) with a common suffix for tail (-ουρος). Thus, once again, the Ancient Greeks prove their superior powers of common sense, since only a moron would rub these noxious vermin before giving them a name. Like other basal insects, silverfish are long-lived, and may survive for up to four years. Compare mice, for example, with a laboratory life-span of two years, the average rock band at 18 months, or the average Ancient Greek at about 30 years. There is surely a lesson here, but it escapes us. Most silverfish occupy the same ecospace presumably occupied by their Carboniferous ancestors -- e.g., under damp plant litter or rocks. Other species of silverfish have crawled out from under the rocks, so to speak, and have evolved adaptations allowing them to live with humans. This, if you think about it, is more than can be said for many humans. Several species are "commensals" in ant or termite colonies, where they may steal the colony's food reserves and devour its young. How, exactly, this behavior qualifies as "commensalism" is unclear. By this measure, a neighborhood drug dealer would qualify as a "commensal." But that is what the textbooks state. Links: Thysanura with identification key to thysanuran families). |
|
|
Lepidotrichidae
|
Nicoletiidae
The nicoletiids are small-bodied (7-18 mm). They are blind and often without pigments in the exoskeleton. Galán 2001). The maxillary palps have five segments. The abdomen almost always lacks eversible vesicles. The tarsus has fewer than 5 segments. Galán recognizes two families. The Atelurinae associate with colonial insects. They have scales, and are short, with ovoid bodies. The Nicoletiinae are elongate, predominantly lack scales, and live in forest litter, under rocks, underground, or in caves. |
|
MaindroniidaeMaindronia. This taxon consists of one genus and three species found in arid regions of Chile, India and Ceylon, where it lives under rocks. This genus lacks ocelli and scales and is closely related to the Lepismatidae, and is often subsumed into that family. |
|
Lepismatidae
Image: Lepisma, from Forestry Images. Photograph by Joseph Berger. It appears that the caudal filament and cerci have been truncated in this specimen. There's another excellent image at Lepismatidae with full-length appendages. |
ATW041019. Text public domain. No rights reserved.
Insecta |
checked ATW050602