Palæos:		Pieces
METAZOA		Hox Genes - References

Page Back	Unit Back	Unit Home	References	Glossary	Pieces
Page Next	Unit Next	Life	Cladogram	Taxon Index	Time

Notes & References

LIFE
|--Eubacteria
`--+--Archaea
   `--Eukarya
      |--Chlorobionta
      `--+--Fungi
         `--METAZOA  
            |--Choanoflagellata  
            `--Porifera 
               |--Radiata
               `--+--Cnidaria 
                  `--Bilateria
                     |--Deuterostomia
                     `--Protostomia
                        |--Ecdysozoa
                        `--Lophotrochozoa

Notes

[1] We know of two exceptions, both highly aberrant cases: in sea urchins (Echinoidea) and in vertebrates.  Both are discussed later.

[2] But see the discussion by Bengston & Budd (2004), Chen et al. (2004a).

[3] Actually we still do -- but not bilaterian segmentation.  However, the idea is too incomplete and too speculative to take up here.    

[4] Much of this section of the paper simply confirms earlier work by others.  However, since we knew very little about either anthozoans or hox genes before starting on this piece, it was very useful to have everything in one place.

[5] Main Nematostella hox cluster, adapted from Ryan et al. (2007):

[6] The Barcelona Group apparantly uses "Bilateria" to mean some kind of stem group -- possibly Nebuchadnezzar > Nematostella.  Consequently, they still refer to the Acoelomorpha as bilaterians.  We will stick to the usual, crown-group definition of Bilateria.

[7] Like the echinoid hox genes, the order of the authors seems to have been altered in the course of this paper's evolution.  The "suggested citation" is followed here.  However, on the actual paper, the authors appear in the order: Cameron, Rowen, Nesbitt, Bloom, Rast, Berney, Arenas-Mena, Martinez, Lucas, Richardson, Davidson, Peterson & Hood. 

[8] Note that the phylogenetic position of the Vetulicolia is much more debatable than our treatment might suggest.  Aldridge et al. (2007) suspect that that they are basal protostomes of some kind. We have some methodological uncertainties with Aldridge et al., but they include a very useful discussion of all the possible affinities of this group.  For a contrasting view, see Shu (2005). 

[9] "There is no work that affects me; nor do I aspire for the fruits of action. Who knows me acting thus unchained by action, is not tied down by actions."  Bhagavad Ghita 4:14.   Actually, this is a mixed translation.  It has absolutely nothing to do with hox systems.  However, we can't help comparing this portion of the Ghita to the Taoist principle (or, if you're a real Taoist, non-principle) of wu-wei.   

[10] To be fair, lots of respectable people believe that rhombomeres are merely an extension of the somites, and no one doubts that the gill arch ("branchiomere") system is very closely coordinated with the rhombomeric system.  Thus Liem et al. (2001), for example, treat the whole thing as one system of segmentation.  We strongly disagree.  More importantly, so do a lot of respectable scientists, e.g. Janvier (1996).  

[11] That isn't quite right, but a more precise definition requires a lot more explanation than we can give until we've covered a lot more ground.  A completely unambiguous definition is still not possible, but a better definition might be: the last common ancestor of Drosophila lab and Branchistoma hox14 and all of its descendants which (a) encode a homeodomain-containing protein and (b) whose closest homologue in Branchiostoma lies within the Branchiostoma hox cluster.  The exceptions are needed to exclude pseudogenes and other non-functional riff-raff, as well as the parahox genes discussed later.  It is still ambiguous because we don't define gene (introns? promoters? miRNA sequences?) and we don't say exactly what closest homologue means.

[12] Update 070712: According to a report, two recent papers in Cell by Gregor et al. emphasize how very preceise the maternal bicoid gradient is and how carefully it is maintained in early embryogenesis.  Again, if so, why do flies need hox genes?  We have not read the papers, but the citations are T. Gregor et al., "Stability and nuclear dynamics of the Bicoid morphogen gradient," Cell July 13, 2007 and T. Gregor et al., "Probing the limits to positional information," Cell, July 13, 2007.

References

Aldridge, RJ, X-G Hou, DJ Siveter, DJ Siveter & SE Gabbott (2007), The systematics and phylogenetic relationships of vetulicolians. Palaeontology 50: 131-168. 

Amores, A, A Force, Y-L Yan, L Joly, C Amemiya, A Fritz, RK Ho, J Langeland, V Prince, Y-L Wang, M Westerfield, M Ekker & JH Postlethwait (1998), Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282: 1711–1714.  

Arenas-Mena, C, AR Cameron & EH Davidson (2000), Spatial expression of hox cluster genes in the ontogeny of a sea urchin.  Development 127: 4631-4643

Arendt, D & J Wittbrodt (2001), Reconstructing the eyes of Urbilateria. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 356: 1545-1563. 

Bengston, S & G Budd (2004), Comment on "Small bilaterian fossils from 40 to 55 million years before the Cambrian". Science 306: 1291b. 

Brooke, NM & PWH Holland (2003), The evolution of multicellularity and early animal genomes.  Curr. Op. Genet. Devel. 13: 599-603.

Brunschwig, K, C Wittmann, R Schnabel, TR Bürglin, H Tobler & F Müller (1999), Anterior organization of the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo by the labial-like Hox gene ceh-13. Development 126: 1537-1546.

Callaerts, P, PN Lee, B Hartmann, C Farfan, DWY Choy, K Ikeo, K-F Fischbach, WJ Gehring & HG de Couet (2002), Hox genes in the sepiolid squid Euprymna scolopes: Implications for the evolution of complex body plans. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 99: 2088-2093

Carroll, SB (2005), Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo and the Making of the Animal Kingdom.  Norton, 350+pp.   

Carroll, SB (2005a), Evolution at two levels: On genes and form.  PLoS Biology 3: 1159-1166. 

Chen, J-Y, DJ Bottjer, P Oliveri, SQ Dornbos, F Gao, S Ruffins, H-M Chi, C-W Li & EH Davidson (2004), Small bilaterian fossils from 40 to 55 million years before the Cambrian. Science 305: 218-222.

Chen, J-Y, P Oliveri, EH Davidson & DJ Bottjer (2004), Response to comment on "Small bilaterian fossils from 40 to 55 million years before the Cambrian". Science 306: 1291b. 

Chiu, C-H, K Dewar, GP Wagner, K Takahashi, F Ruddle, C Ledje, P Bartsch, J-L Scemama, E Stellwag, C Fried, SJ Prohaska, PF Stadler, & CT Amemiya (2004), Bichir HoxA cluster sequence reveals surprising trends in ray-finned fish genomic evolution.  Genome Res. 14: 11-17. 

Cook, CE, E Jiménez, M Akam & Emili Saló (2004), The Hox gene complement of acoel flatworms, a basal bilaterian clade.  Evol. Devel. 6: 154-163.  

Copf, T, N Rabet, SE Celniker & M Averof (2003), Posterior patterning genes and the identification of a unique body region in the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana.  Development 130, 5915-5927.

Couly, G, S Creuzet, S Bennaceur, C Vincent & NM Le Douarin (2002), Interactions between Hox-negative cephalic neural crest cells and the foregut endoderm in patterning the facial skeleton in the vertebrate head.  Development 129: 1061-1073. 

deRobertis, EM, EA Morita & KWY Cho (1991), Gradient fields and homeobox genes. Development 112: 669-678. 

de Rosa, R, JK Grenier, T Andreeva, CE Cook, A Adoutte, M Akam, SB Carroll & G Balavoine (1999), Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution. Nature 399: 772-776. 

Donoghue, PCJ & MA Purnell (2005), Genome duplication, extinction and vertebrate evolution.  TREE 46.4

Dufour, HD, Z  Chettouh, C Deyts, R de Rosa, C Goridis, J-S Joly, & J-F Brunet (2006), Precraniate origin of cranial motoneurons. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 103: 8727-8732. 

Eisenmann, DM, JN Maloof, JS Simske, C Kenyon & SK Kim (1998), The β-catenin homolog BAR-1 and LET-60 Ras coordinately regulate the Hox gene lin-39 during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development. Development 125: 3667-3680. 

García-Fernàndez, J (2005), Hox, ParaHox, ProtoHox: facts and guesses.  Heredity 94: 145-152.

Ghysen, A (2003), The origin and evolution of the nervous system.  Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47: 555-562.

Giraldo, R & R Díaz-Orejas (2001), Similarities between the DNA replication initiators of Gram-negative bacteria plasmids (RepA) and eukaryotes (Orc4p)/archaea (Cdc6p). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 98: 4938-4943. 

Hinman, VF, EK O'Brien, GS Richards & BM Degnan (2003) Expression of anterior Hox genes during larval development of the gastropod Haliotis asinina. Evol. Devel. 5: 508–521. [abstract]

Hughes, CL & TC Kauffman (2002), Exploring the myriapod body plan: expression patterns of the ten Hox genes in a centipede.  Development 129: 1225-1238.

Ikuta, T, N Yoshida, N Satoh & H Saiga (2004), Ciona intestinalis hox gene cluster: Its dispersed structure and residual colinear expression in development.  Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 101: 15118-15123. 

Irvine, SQ & MQ Martindale (2001), Comparative analysis of hox gene expression in the polychaete Chaetopterus: Implications for the evolution of body plan regionalization. Amer. Zool. 41: 640-651.

Iyer, D, D Chang, J Marx, L Wei, EN Olson, MS Parmacek, A Balasubramanyam, & RJ Schwartz (2006), Serum response factor MADS box serine-162 phosphorylation switches proliferation and myogenic gene programs.  Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 103: 4516-4521. 

Janvier, P (1996), Early Vertebrates, Oxford, 393 pp.

Jiménez-Guri, E, J Paps, J García-Fernàndez & E Saló (2006), Hox and ParaHox genes in Nemertodermatida, a basal bilaterian clade.  Int. J. Dev. Biol. 50: 675-679. 

Kim, C-B, C Amemiya, W Bailey, K Kawasaki, J Mezey, W Milleri, S Minoshima, N Shimizu, Günter Wagner & F Ruddle (2000), Hox cluster genomics in the horn shark, Heterodontus francisci.  Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 97: 1655-1660. 

Kmita-Cunisse, M, F Loosli, J Bièrne & WJ Gehring (1998), Homeobox genes in the ribbonworm Lineus sanguineus: Evolutionary implications.  Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 95: 3030-3035. 

Kofuji, R, N Sumikawa, M Yamasaki, K Kondo, K Ueda, M Ito, & M Hasebe (2003), Evolution and divergence of the MADS-box gene family based on genome-wide expression analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 1963–1977. 

Kuratani, S (2005), Craniofacial development and the evolution of the vertebrates: The old problems on a new background.  Zool. Sci. 22: 1-19. 

Lee, PN, P Callaerts, HG de Couet & MQ Martindale (2003), Cephalopod Hox genes and the origin of morphological novelties.  Nature 424:1061-1065. 

Liem, KF, WE Bemis, WF Walker & L Grande (2001), Functional Anatomy of the Vertebrates: an Evolutionary Perspective [3rd ed.].  Harcourt College, 703+ pp.  This textbook is known as "Bemis" in vertebrate circles. 

Maeda, RK & F Karch (2006), The ABC of the BX-C: the bithorax complex explained.  Development 133: 1413-1422. 

Martindale, MQ, K Pang & JR Finnerty (2004), Investigating the origins of triploblasty: ‘mesodermal’ gene expression in a diploblastic animal, the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis (phylum, Cnidaria; class, Anthozoa). Development 131: 2463-2474. 

Minguillón, C & J Garcia-Fernàndez (2003), Genesis and evolution of the Evx and Mox genes and the extended Hox and ParaHox gene clusters.  Genome Biol. 4: R12.

Minguillón C, J Gardenyes, E Serra, LFC Castro, A Hill-Force, PWH Holland, CT Amemiya, & J Garcia-Fernàndez (2005), No more than 14: the end of the amphioxus Hox cluster. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 1: 19-23

Momose, T & E Houliston (2007), Two oppositely localised frizzled RNAs as axis determinants in a cnidarian embryo. PLoS Biol. 5: e70.

Monteiro, AS & DEK Ferrier (2006), Hox genes are not always colinear.  Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2: 95-103. 

Murakami, Y, M Pasqualetti, Y Takio, S Hirano, FM Rijli & S Kuratani (2003), Segmental development of reticulospinal and branchiomotor neurons in lamprey: insights into the evolution of the vertebrate hindbrain.  Development 131: 983-995. 

Nelson, DL & MM Cox (2005), Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 4th ed.  WH Freeman, 1119+ pp. 

Papillon, D, Y Perez, L Fasano, Y Le Parco & X Caubit (2005), Restricted expression of a median Hox gene in the central nervous system of chaetognaths. Dev. Genes Evol. 215: 369-373. 

Parmley, JL, AO Urrutia, L Potrzebowski, H Kaessmann, & LD Hurst (2007), Splicing and the evolution of proteins in mammals.  PLoS Biol. 5: e14. 

Pearson, JC, D Lemons & W McGinnis (2005), Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning.  Nature Rev. Genetics 6: 893-904. 

Peterson, KJ, SQ Irvine, RA Cameron & EH Davidson (2000), Quantitative assessment of hox complex expression in the indirect development of the polychaete annelid Chaetopterus sp. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 97: 4487-4492.

Peterson, KJ, MA McPeek & DAD Evans (2005), Tempo and mode of early animal evolution: inferences from rocks, Hox, and molecular clocks.  Paleobiology 31: 36-55.   

Richardson, PM, S Lucas, RA Cameron, L Rowen, R Nesbitt, S Bloom, JP Rast, K Berney, C Arenas-Mena, P Martinez, EH Davidson, KJ Peterson & L Hood (2005), Unusual gene order and organization of the sea urchin hox cluster. Lawrence Berkeley Nat. Lab. Paper LBNL-57898.

Rogozin, IB, YI Wolf, L Carmel & EV Koonin (2007), Ecdysozoan clade rejected by genome-wide analysis of rare amino acid replacements. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1080–1090.

Ryan, JF, PM Burton, ME Mazza, GK Kwong, JC Mullikin & JR Finnerty (2006), The cnidarian-bilaterian ancestor possessed at least 56 homeoboxes: evidence from the starlet sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis.  Genome Biol. 7: R64. 

Ryan, JF, ME Mazza, K Pang, DQ Matus, AD Baxevanis, MQ Martindale & JR Finnerty (2007), Pre-bilaterian origins of the Hox cluster and the Hox code: Evidence from the sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis.  PLoS ONE 2: e153.

Saló, E, J Tauler, E Jimenez, JR Bayascas, J Gonzalez-Linares, J García-Fernàndez, & J Baguña (2001), Hox and parahox genes in flatworms: Characterization and expression. Amer. Zool. 41:652–663. 

Schram, FR & S Koenemann (2004), Developmental genetics and arthropod evolution: On body Regions of Crustacea, in G Scholtz (ed.), Evolutionary Developmental Biology of Crustacea. Crust. Issues 15: 75-92.

Seaver, EC (2003), Segmentation: mono- or polyphyletic? Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47: 583-595. 

Shankland, M & EC Seaver (2000), Evolution of the bilaterian body plan: What have we learned from annelids? Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 97: 4434-4437. 

Shu, D-G (2005), On the phylum Vetulicolia. Chin. Sci. Bull. 50: 2342-2354. 

Shu, D-G, S Conway Morris, J Han, L Chen, X-L Zhang, Z-F Zhang, H-Q Liu, Y Li, & J-N Liu (2001), Primitive deuterostomes from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte (Lower Cambrian, China). Nature 414: 419-424.

Shu, D-G, S Conway Morris, J Han, Z-F Zhang & J-N Liu (2004), Ancestral echinoderms from the Chengjiang deposits of China. Nature 430: 422-428.

Sullivan, JC, AM Reitzel & JR Finnerty (2006), A high percentage of introns in human genes were present early in animal evolution: Evidence from the basal metazoan Nematostella vectensis. Genome Inform. 17: 219-229.

Swalla, BJ, CB Cameron, LS Corley & JR Garey (2000), Urochordates are monophyletic within deuterostomes. Syst. Biol. 49: 52-64.

Takahashi, T & PWH Holland (2004), Amphioxus and ascidian Dmbx homeobox genes give clues to the vertebrate origins of midbrain development. Development 131: 3285-3294.

Valentine, JW, D Jablonski & DH Erwin (1999), Fossils, molecules and embryos: new perspectives on the Cambrian explosion. Development 126: 851-859. 

Van Auken, K, DC Weaver, LG Edgar & WB Wood (2000), Caenorhabditis elegans embryonic axial patterning requires two recently discovered posterior-group hox genes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 97: 4499–4503. 

Wang, M & G Caetano-Anollés (2006), Global phylogeny determined by the combination of protein domains in proteomes.  Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 2444–2454. [abstract]. 

Wittmann, C, O Bossinger, B Goldstein, M Fleischmann, R Kohler, K Brunschwig, H Tobler & F Müller (1997), The expression of the C. elegans labial-like Hox gene ceh-13 during early embryogenesis relies on cell fate and on anteroposterior cell polarity. Development 124: 4193-4200.

Wolf, YI, IB Rogozin & EV Koonin (2004), Coelomata and not Ecdysozoa: Evidence from genome-wide phylogenetic analysis.  Genome Res. 14: 29-36. 

Yang, L, M Sym & C Kenyon (2005), The roles of two C. elegans HOX co-factor orthologs in cell migration and vulva development. Development 132: 1413-1428.